Home/Supreme Court of Oklahoma/Bank of Taft v. Thompson

Bank of Taft v. Thompson

1911 OK 355, 119 P. 124, 29 Okla. 683, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 360
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedNovember 14, 1911
Docket1478
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1911 OK 355 (Bank of Taft v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bank of Taft v. Thompson, 1911 OK 355, 119 P. 124, 29 Okla. 683, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 360 (Okla. 1911).

Opinion

KANE, J.

This cause comes on to be heard upon motion of the defendants in error to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that the plaintiff in error has failed to observe rule 7 of this court (30 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) in not filing briefs within the required time. An examination of the record shows, that the plaintiff in error is in default in regard to filing briefs, although the time for doing so has expired.

' The motion to dismiss must be sustained.

TURNER, C. J., and DUNN and HAYES, JJ., concur; WILLIAMS, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Simmer v. Gray
1923 OK 737 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Turner v. Huffstetler
1912 OK 579 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1911 OK 355, 119 P. 124, 29 Okla. 683, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-taft-v-thompson-okla-1911.