Turner v. Huffstetler

1912 OK 579, 126 P. 730, 33 Okla. 462, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 727
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided September 11, 1912·No. 2221·Published

Opinion

HAYES, J.

This case was filed in this court on December 29, 1911. Plaintiffs in error have failed to serve and file their brief in compliance with rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi), or within the extension of time thereafter granted by the court; and upon the authority of Douglas v. Clayton Townsite Co., 29 Okla. 9, 115 Pac. 1016, Bank of Taft v. Thompson, 29 Okla. 683, 119 Pac. 124, Bruce v. Ketcham, 29 Okla. 685, 119 Pac. 124, and Lugrand v. Harris, 29 Okla. 690, 119 Pac. 127, this appeal must be dismissed for want of prosecution.

TURNER, C. J., and WILLIAMS, KANE, and DUNN, JJ-, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turner v. Huffstetler, 1912 OK 579, 126 P. 730, 33 Okla. 462, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 727 (Okla. 1912).

1912 OK 579 (Turner v. Huffstetler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of Taft v. Thompson
1911 OK 355 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
Douglas v. Clayton Townsite Co.
1911 OK 146 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
Lugrand v. Harris
1911 OK 405 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
Bruce v. Ketcham
1911 OK 361 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)