Connecticut Statutes
§ 52-596 — Actions for payment of remuneration for employment.
Connecticut § 52-596
This text of Connecticut § 52-596 (Actions for payment of remuneration for employment.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-596 (2026).
Text
No action for the payment of remuneration for employment payable periodically shall be brought but within two years after the right of action accrues, except that this limitation shall be tolled upon the filing with the Labor Commissioner of a complaint of failure to pay wages pursuant to the provisions of chapter 558.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Williams v. Walsh
558 F.2d 667 (Second Circuit, 1977)
Lisa ASP & Paulette Mertes v. Milardo Photography, Inc.
573 F. Supp. 2d 677 (D. Connecticut, 2008)
Brunoli v. Fred Brunoli & Sons, Inc. Pension Plan
993 F. Supp. 66 (D. Connecticut, 1997)
Quiello v. Reward Network Establishment Services, Inc.
420 F. Supp. 2d 23 (D. Connecticut, 2006)
Richardson v. Costco Wholesale Corp.
169 F. Supp. 2d 56 (D. Connecticut, 2001)
Pelton v. Olin Corporation, No. Cv88-0092063 (Jul. 30, 1991)
1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 6189 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1991)
McKosky v. Plastech Corporation, No. 426036 (Jun. 13, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 7547 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Warzecha v. Nutmeg Companies, Inc.
48 F. Supp. 2d 151 (D. Connecticut, 1999)
Jacques All Trades v. City of Hartford, No. Cv 99-0576742-S (Nov. 8, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 13991 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Muniz v. Weatherstone Corporation, No. Cv 94 0065789 (Oct. 14, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 10500 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
Buitekant v. Zotos Corp. Shiseido Co., No. Cv94 0135874 S (Jul. 29, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 5122 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
Barwise v. Lexington Healthcare Group, No. Cv99 0065432s (Oct. 24, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 14565 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Conroy v. Foxwoods Casino Dealers' Toke Comm., No. 114947 (Oct. 26, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 14267 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Savinova v. Nova Home Care, LLC
(D. Connecticut, 2024)
Zhen Zhu v. Matsu Corp.
(D. Connecticut, 2022)
Headly v. Liberty Homecare Options, LLC
(D. Connecticut, 2022)
Lu v. Diamond Nail & Spa CT Inc
(D. Connecticut, 2022)
Modise v. CareOne Health Services, LLC
(D. Connecticut, 2022)
Anthony Guadino v. City of Hartford and Jason Thody
(D. Connecticut, 2025)
Cojom v. Roblen, LLC
(D. Connecticut, 2025)
Legislative History
(1949 Rev., S. 8336; P.A. 80-182.) History: P.A. 80-182 added exception re filing of complaint for failure to pay wages with labor commissioner. Does not apply to severance pay which is not within description of “payment of remuneration for employment payable periodically”. 155 C. 680. Cited. 214 C. 464. Cited. 11 CA 375; 16 CA 232; 43 CA 435. Payments must occur at regular intervals to qualify as periodic payments. 96 CA 673.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 52-109
Substituted plaintiff.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 52-596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/52-596.