Connecticut Statutes

§ 49-42 — Enforcement of right to payment on bond. Suit on bond, procedure and judgment.

Connecticut § 49-42
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 49Mortgages and Liens
Ch. 847Liens

This text of Connecticut § 49-42 (Enforcement of right to payment on bond. Suit on bond, procedure and judgment.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 49-42 (2026).

Text

(a)(1) Any person who performed work or supplied materials for which a requisition was submitted to, or for which an estimate was prepared by, the awarding authority and who does not receive full payment for such work or materials within sixty days of the applicable payment date provided for in subsection (a) of section 49-41a, or any person who supplied materials or performed subcontracting work not included on a requisition or estimate who has not received full payment for such materials or work within sixty days after the date such materials were supplied or such work was performed, may enforce such person's right to payment under the bond by serving a notice of claim on the surety that issued the bond and a copy of such notice to the contractor named as principal in the bond not later

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Saturn Construction Co. v. Premier Roofing Co.
680 A.2d 1274 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1996)
87 case citations
Millgard Corp. v. White Oak Corp.
224 F. Supp. 2d 425 (D. Connecticut, 2002)
10 case citations
Bleiler v. Cristwood Construction, Inc.
72 F.3d 13 (Second Circuit, 1995)
10 case citations
Elgard Corp. v. Brennan Construction Co.
157 F.R.D. 1 (D. Connecticut, 1994)
9 case citations
Bleiler v. Cristwood Contracting Co., Inc.
868 F. Supp. 461 (D. Connecticut, 1994)
3 case citations
Blackburn v. Iversen
925 F. Supp. 118 (D. Connecticut, 1996)
3 case citations
Elgard Corp. v. Brennan Construction Co.
388 F.3d 30 (Second Circuit, 2004)
2 case citations
B.W. Dexter II v. A. Prete Son Cons., No. Cv 96-0557033s (Aug. 23, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 5261-AAAAAAAA (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
1 case citations
Connecticut St. Med. v. Connecticare, No. X01 Cv 01 0165649s (Apr. 1, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 4140 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Kamco Supply v. Maplewood School Apt., No. Cv98 035 22 95 S (Sep. 19, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 13187 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Kelvin Corporation v. Foley, No. 29 22 33 (Oct. 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 11110 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Abc Supply Co., Inc. v. Atlas Const. Co., No. Cv 94-0362708 (Sep. 13, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 9188 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Buono, No. Spno 9407 16392 (Feb. 21, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 1275 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Kurtzman-Violette Htg. v. Konover Const., No. Cv 940543571 (May 26, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 5853 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Nacorp Construction v. Colossale Conc., No. Cv 96 0562591-S (Nov. 17, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 13965 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Carlin Cont. v. Blakeslee Arpaia Chapman, No. Cv 99-00551690 (Feb. 22, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 2393 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Freiheit v. Woyke, No. Cv 9352158s (Aug. 7, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 8997 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
STEWARD MACH. CO., INC. v. White Oak Corp.
462 F. Supp. 2d 251 (D. Connecticut, 2006)

Legislative History

(1949 Rev., S. 7215; 1961, P.A. 228; 1969, P.A. 192, S. 1; P.A. 78-280, S. 2, 127; P.A. 79-602, S. 100; P.A. 87-345, S. 2; P.A. 94-188, S. 16; P.A. 00-36; P.A. 01-195, S. 48, 181; P.A. 06-78, S. 1; P.A. 09-146, S. 3; P.A. 16-104, S. 2.) History: 1961 act required that payment be made within 90 days rather than 60 days in Subsec. (a); 1969 act required that suit commence within one year after date on which last of the labor was performed or material was supplied rather than within one year “after the date of final settlement of such contract” in Subsec. (b); P.A. 78-280 substituted “judicial district” for “county” in Subsec. (b); P.A. 79-602 made minor changes in wording but made no substantive changes; P.A. 87-345 substantially amended procedure set forth in Subsec. (a) for enforcement of right to payment under bond; P.A. 94-188 amended procedure set forth in Subsec. (a) for enforcement of right to payment under bond and amended Subsec. (b) by adding language concerning the applicable payment date provided for in Sec. 49-41a and the time within which to commence suit for materials or work not included on a requisition or estimate; P.A. 00-36 redefined “material” in Subsec. (c) to include construction equipment that is rented or leased for use in prosecution of work or in construction, raising, removal of any building or improvement of lot or in site development or subdivision and to apply term to Secs. 49-33 to 49-43, inclusive; P.A. 01-195 made technical changes in Subsecs. (a) and (c), effective July 11, 2001; P.A. 06-78 added provision in Subsec. (a) re notice for payment of retainage, added provisions in Subsec. (b) re commencement of suit within one year of last date materials were supplied or work was performed by claimant and requiring suit seeking payment solely for retainage to be commenced within one year after retainage payment was due, pursuant to Sec. 49-41a(a) and made conforming and technical changes in Subsecs. (a) and (b), effective May 30, 2006; P.A. 09-146 replaced reference to Sec. 49-41a(b) with reference to Sec. 49-41a(c) in Subsec. (a), effective July 1, 2009; P.A. 16-104 amended Subsec. (a) to designate existing provisions re enforcement of person's right to payment under bond by serving notice of claim on surety as Subdiv. (1) and amend same by adding provisions re surety's failure to discharge obligations not deemed to constitute waiver of defenses, and to designate existing provisions re surety that denies liability on claim may bring action in Superior Court as Subdiv. (2) and amend same by making technical changes, effective July 1, 2016. Cited. 143 C. 85. History discussed. 151 C. 332. Material actually forming part of work provided for in public works contract, as well as labor performed at the site, is clearly within contemplated coverage of payment bond required for protection of persons who have furnished “labor or material in the prosecution of the work”. Id., 334. Test as to whether labor and materials used in making repairs which are major items are covered by payment bond is whether item was necessitated by rigors of job rather than prior condition of equipment and whether supplier and purchasing contractor reasonably expected that item would be substantially consumed on the job. Id., 335. Having found that no administrative determination by public works commissioner of final settlement date had been made under Sec. 49-43, court was justified in concluding that no final settlement within meaning of this section could be said to have preceded actual payment and exchange of releases, and that subject action commenced within 3 months of that date had been timely brought. 159 C. 563. Cited. 174 C. 219. Remedies afforded by this section and Sec. 49-41a(b) are independent and notice requirements of later are not prerequisite to suit initiated under this section. 207 C. 468. Cited. 229 C. 303; 236 C. 750; 238 C. 293; 239 C. 708; 240 C. 10. Under 1995 revision, action on bond executed by surety pursuant to Sec. 49-41 is governed by this section, and plaintiff cannot bring a common-law action on bond. 293 C. 569. Cited. 25 CA 751; 29 CA 783; 32 CA 118; Id., 133. Claims under section are not preempted by ERISA. 40 CA 777. Neither Sec. 49-41a(c) nor this section contain any language to suggest that the substantial performance language of Sec. 49-41a(c) applies to a subcontractor's claim under this section against a surety. 207 CA 551. Cited. 17 CS 297. Fact that written notice was given to the contractor in an action on bond must be recited in the complaint or a copy annexed thereto; failure to comply with this rule left the complaint deficient. 18 CS 43. Until the subcontractor exercises his right of action granted by section, there is no debt due from the contractor to the subcontractor which can be garnished. 21 CS 16. Cited. 32 CS 168. Subsec. (a): Decision permits subcontractor to sue on surety bond despite failure to comply precisely with notice requirements of section. 225 C. 367. 90-day response requirement is directory, not mandatory, and legislature did not intend that a surety that fails to pay or to deny a claim by the statutory deadline thereby waives any substantive defenses and forfeits its right to contest the merits of the claim. 314 C. 749. Because section requires only “substantial accuracy” re complaint, plaintiff was not obligated to prove that company X was now known as company Y; trial court erred in refusing to admit evidence of notice of claim on the surety. 49 CA 522.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 49-42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/49-42.