Connecticut Statutes
§ 49-1 — When foreclosure a bar to further action on debt.
Connecticut § 49-1
This text of Connecticut § 49-1 (When foreclosure a bar to further action on debt.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 49-1 (2026).
Text
The foreclosure of a mortgage is a bar to any further action upon the mortgage debt, note or obligation against the person or persons who are liable for the payment thereof who are made parties to the foreclosure and also against any person or persons upon whom service of process to constitute an action in personam could have been made within this state at the commencement of the foreclosure; but the foreclosure is not a bar to any further action upon the mortgage debt, note or obligation as to any person liable for the payment thereof upon whom service of process to constitute an action in personam could not have been made within this state at the commencement of the foreclosure. The judgment in each such case shall state the names of all persons upon whom service of process has been made
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Vincent
260 B.R. 617 (D. Connecticut, 2000)
Derisme v. Hunt Leibert Jacobson P.C.
880 F. Supp. 2d 311 (D. Connecticut, 2012)
Hoffman v. Cheek (In Re Meltzer)
90 B.R. 21 (D. Connecticut, 1988)
14th Rma Partners, L.P. v. Antonio Reale, Joseph Reale, Lan Associates Xii Limited Partnership, Lan Associates Viii Limited Partnership
100 F.3d 278 (Second Circuit, 1996)
Beverly Hills Suites LLC v. Town of Windsor Locks
136 F. Supp. 3d 167 (D. Connecticut, 2015)
Centra Mortgage Holdings, Ltd. v. Mannix
18 F. Supp. 2d 162 (D. Connecticut, 1998)
Norwich Savings Society v. Flonnes (In Re Flonnes)
183 B.R. 37 (D. Connecticut, 1995)
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Sextant Development Corp.
142 F.R.D. 55 (D. Connecticut, 1992)
Federal Deposit Ins. v. Louis Wade Co., No. Cv910395703 (Nov. 23, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 11779 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
Southridge Condo. v. the Dime Sav. Bk., No. Cv 940539852s (May 16, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 5769 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Benchmark Municipal Tax Lien Services, LTD v. Lewis
(D. Connecticut, 2020)
Legislative History
(1949 Rev., S. 7191; 1957, P.A. 443; P.A. 79-602, S. 74.) History: P.A. 79-602 made minor changes in wording, substituting “the” for “such”, etc., but made no substantive changes. Before statute, foreclosure was a bar to further action on the mortgage debt. 1 R. 203; 3 C. 63; 5 C. 535; 18 C. 136; 91 C. 586. Provisions of section requiring persons liable for the mortgage debt to be made parties to the foreclosure apply only to foreclosure proceedings begun after section was enacted. 56 C. 146. Section applies to mortgages of personalty. 58 C. 257. Consideration of separate action against endorser after foreclosure and deficiency judgment against maker only. 100 C. 710; 102 C. 648. Parties liable in separate action even though deficiency not claimed in foreclosure suit. 109 C. 333. Cited. 112 C. 611. Guarantors named in foreclosure allowed same credit as mortgagor. 113 C. 246. Cited. 116 C. 332. Failure to name one a party defendant merely bars the remedy. 119 C. 586. Cited. 120 C. 671. Effect of failing to name parties in foreclosure of prior mortgages. 122 C. 314. Cited. 141 C. 179. Does not change requirements of Sec. 49-14. 154 C. 216. Cited. 185 C. 579; 199 C. 368; 216 C. 443; 220 C. 152; Id., 643; 228 C. 929. Section prohibits a personal remedy against mortgagor but does not eliminate the underlying mortgage debt and does not supersede bank's continuing access to equitable foreclosure proceedings. 244 C. 251. Statute did not apply because original common charges debt was not extinguished by foreclosure action based on a statutorily created lien. 247 C. 575. Section does not evidence a clear intention to extinguish the otherwise independent obligations of the guarantors by making them effectively necessary parties to a claim that seeks the strict foreclosure of a mortgage. 312 C. 662. Cited. 25 CA 159; 28 CA 809; 31 CA 80; Id., 476; 32 CA 309; 33 CA 388; 35 CA 81; 38 CA 198; 40 CA 434; 44 CA 588. Trustee's sale of property in another state does not bar action here since defendant not a person on whom service of process in Connecticut could have been made at commencement of trustee's sale in the other state. 48 CA 531. A foreclosure plaintiff who fails to file a timely motion for a deficiency judgment under Sec. 49-14 cannot recover additional damages from a guarantor based on the terms of a guaranty, the purpose of which was to secure the debt owed under the mortgage note. 137 CA 680; judgment reversed, see 312 C. 662. Cited. 2 CS 98. When a mortgagee takes property on foreclosure, the taking of the property satisfies the debt only pro tanto to value of property on date it is appropriated. 3 CS 261. Distinction between this section and Sec. 49-14 discussed. 6 CS 123. Cited. Id., 300.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 49-14
Deficiency judgment.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 49-1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/49-1.