Connecticut Statutes

§ 49-10 — Assignment of mortgage debt. Form of instrument. Requirements. Sufficient notice of assignment. Allocation of recording fees paid by a nominee of a mortgagee. Operation of executed assignment.

Connecticut § 49-10
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 49Mortgages and Liens
Ch. 846Mortgages

This text of Connecticut § 49-10 (Assignment of mortgage debt. Form of instrument. Requirements. Sufficient notice of assignment. Allocation of recording fees paid by a nominee of a mortgagee. Operation of executed assignment.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 49-10 (2026).

Text

(a)As used in this section, “mortgage debt” means a debt or other obligation secured by mortgage, assignment of rent or assignment of interest in a lease.
(b)Whenever any mortgage debt is assigned by an instrument in writing containing a sufficient description to identify the mortgage, assignment of rent or assignment of interest in a lease, given as security for the mortgage debt, and that assignment has been executed, attested and acknowledged in the manner prescribed by law for the execution, attestation and acknowledgment of deeds of land, the title held by virtue of the mortgage, assignment of rent or assignment of interest in a lease, shall vest in the assignee. An instrument substantially in the following form is sufficient for such assignment: Know all Men by these Presents, That

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Spano
161 B.R. 880 (D. Connecticut, 1993)
22 case citations
Matter of Sansone
126 B.R. 16 (D. Connecticut, 1991)
12 case citations
Packer v. SN Servicing Corp.
250 F.R.D. 108 (D. Connecticut, 2008)
7 case citations
Source One Mortgage Services v. Schwartz, No. Cv-93-0068700 (Dec. 8, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 12459 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
Costello v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
(D. Connecticut, 2022)

Legislative History

(1949 Rev., S. 7114; P.A. 75-24; P.A. 79-602, S. 70; P.A. 83-564, S. 1; P.A. 98-147, S. 1; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 98-1, S. 88; P.A. 06-156, S. 3; P.A. 13-184, S. 97; 13-247, S. 81.) History: P.A. 75-24 applied provisions with respect to assignment of rent or assignment of interest in lease and added form for instrument of assignment; P.A. 79-602 substituted “is” for “shall be” and “that” or “the” for “such” where appearing; P.A. 83-564 added Subsec. (b) concerning the assignment of residential mortgage loans; P.A. 98-147 added new Subsec. (a) defining “mortgage debt”, redesignated existing Subsecs. (a) and (b) as Subsecs. (b) and (c), and added new Subsecs. (d), (e), (f) and (g) requiring sufficient notice of assignment by assignee and reasonable proof of assignment before party obliged to pay assignee; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 98-1 made technical changes in Subsec. (c); P.A. 06-156 added Subsec. (h) re operation of assignment executed in accordance with section; P.A. 13-184 added new Subsec. (h) re allocation of recording fees paid by a nominee of a mortgagee, and redesignated existing Subsec. (h) as Subsec. (i), effective July 1, 2013; P.A. 13-247 added new Subsec. (h) re allocation of recording fees paid by a nominee of a mortgagee, and redesignated existing Subsec. (h) as Subsec. (i), effective July 15, 2013. Cited. 121 C. 267. Assignment held valid even though assignee gave no consideration and did not know of assignment until after the death of the assignor. 148 C. 466. Cited. 202 C. 566. Distinctions established by Subsec. (h) are rationally related to legitimate public interests and do not offend equal protection provisions of state or federal constitution; Subsec. (h) does not discriminate impermissibly against interstate commerce and does not offend the dormant commerce clause of federal constitution. 320 C. 448. Cited. 2 CA 98. Section does not indicate that a flaw in the instrument or its recordation would make it inadmissible as evidence. 51 CA 733. Assignment of note evidencing a debt automatically carries with it assignment of the mortgage even when mortgage is in the hands of another. 52 CA 374. There is no requirement that a party use the exact language or form provided for in Subsec. (b). 134 CA 699. Validating act of 1933 cured the assignment of a mortgage which was defective because it was not under seal. 3 CS 321.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 49-10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/49-10.