Connecticut Statutes

§ 31-68 — Collection of minimum or overtime wage. Class action certifications. Collection of wages for employee whose whereabouts are unknown.

Connecticut § 31-68
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 31Labor
Ch. 558Wages

This text of Connecticut § 31-68 (Collection of minimum or overtime wage. Class action certifications. Collection of wages for employee whose whereabouts are unknown.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-68 (2026).

Text

(a)(1) If any employee is paid by his or her employer less than the minimum fair wage or overtime wage to which he or she is entitled under sections 31-58, 31-59 and 31-60 or by virtue of a minimum fair wage order he or she shall recover, in a civil action, (A) twice the full amount of such minimum wage or overtime wage less any amount actually paid to him or her by the employer, with costs and such reasonable attorney's fees as may be allowed by the court, or (B) if the employer establishes that the employer had a good faith belief that the underpayment of such wages was in compliance with the law, the full amount of such minimum wage or overtime wage less any amount actually paid to him or her by the employer, with costs and such reasonable attorney's fees as may be allowed by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estanislau v. Manchester Developers, LLC
316 F. Supp. 2d 104 (D. Connecticut, 2004)
6 case citations
Strauch v. Computer Sciences Corp.
322 F.R.D. 157 (D. Connecticut, 2017)
2 case citations
McKosky v. Plastech Corporation, No. 426036 (Jun. 13, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 7547 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
1 case citations
Krenisky v. Tony's, Inc., No. 94-0357643s (Dec. 9, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 12621 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
Savinova v. Nova Home Care, LLC
(D. Connecticut, 2025)
Rzasa v. BJ's Restaurants, Inc.
(D. Connecticut, 2023)
Kinkead v. Humana, Inc.
(D. Connecticut, 2020)
Nqadolo v. Care at Home, LLC
(D. Connecticut, 2025)
Cojom v. Roblen, LLC
(D. Connecticut, 2025)

Legislative History

(1949 Rev., S. 3796; 1959, P.A. 683, S. 5; 1963, P.A. 124; P.A. 89-157, S. 1; P.A. 94-184, S. 1; June 30 Sp. Sess. P.A. 03-1, S. 72; P.A. 15-86, S. 1; July 22 Sp. Sess. P.A. 19-1, S. 6.) History: 1959 act added overtime wage; 1963 act added Subsec. (b) re disposition of wages of employee whose whereabouts are unknown; P.A. 89-157 provided that an employee may recover twice the amount of wages due him, authorized the commissioner to collect unpaid wages on behalf of the employee and to bring any legal action necessary for the collection of the wages and provided for the distribution of any collected wages; P.A. 94-184 deleted reference to repealed Sec. 3-72a; June 30 Sp. Sess. P.A. 03-1 amended Subsec. (b) by adding provision re notwithstanding Sec. 3-60b, effective August 16, 2003; P.A. 15-86 amended Subsec. (a) by replacing “may” with “shall” re recovery in civil action, designating existing provision re twice the full amount of minimum wage as Subdiv. (1) and amending same by adding “or overtime wage”, adding Subdiv. (2) re employer's good faith belief, and making technical changes; July 22 Sp. Sess. P.A. 19-1 designated existing provisions re employee paid less than minimum fair wage or overtime wage under Secs. 31-58, 31-59 and 31-60 as new Subdiv. (1), redesignated existing Subdivs. (1) and (2) as Subparas. (A) and (B), added Subdiv. (2) re employee paid less than minimum fair wage or overtime wage under Sec. 31-62-E4 of regulations of Connecticut state agencies, added Subdiv. (3) re suit for benefit of other alleged similarly situated persons in case brought for violations of Sec. 31-62-E4 of regulations of Connecticut state agencies, designated existing provisions re agreement between employee and employer to work for less than minimum fair wage or overtime wage as Subdiv. (4) and amended same by adding “as described in this section”, effective January 6, 2020. Cited. 140 C. 73; 223 C. 573; 232 C. 91. The recordkeeping requirements in Sec. 31-62-E3(b) and (c) of the Regulations of Connecticut state agencies are directory and noncompliance with those requirements did not invalidate the tip credit and did not give rise to a private cause of action under Subsec. (a). 219 CA 648. Formula for determining minimum hourly rate examined. 18 CS 157.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 31-68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/31-68.