Connecticut Statutes

§ 31-105 — Unfair labor practices.

Connecticut·Title 31 Labor·Ch. 561 Labor Relations Act

It shall be an unfair labor practice for an employer:

(1)To spy upon or keep under surveillance, whether directly or through agents or any other person, any activities of employees or their representatives in the exercise of the rights set forth in section 31-104;
(2)to prepare, maintain, distribute or circulate any blacklist of individuals for the purpose of preventing any of such individuals from obtaining or retaining employment because of the exercise by such individuals of any of the rights set forth in section 31-104;
(3)to dominate or actually interfere with the formation, existence or administration of any employee organization or association, agency or plan which exists in whole or in part for the purpose of dealing with employers concerning terms or conditions of employment, l

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Connecticut § 31-105 (Unfair labor practices.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Legislative History

(1949 Rev., S. 7392; February, 1965, P.A. 256; P.A. 10-32, S. 102.) History: 1965 act amended Subdiv. (4) to specify that requiring employee or potential employee to reveal membership, past membership or nonmembership in a labor organization is an unfair practice; (Revisor's note: In 1991 the lower case alphabetic Subpara. indicators in Subdiv. (3) were replaced editorially by the Revisors with upper case alphabetic indicators); P.A. 10-32 made technical changes in Subdivs. (3) and (8), effective May 10, 2010. Cited. 138 C. 277. Prohibits acts by employers which coerce employees in exercise of their right of self-organization. 139 C. 95. Cited. 142 C. 457. Layoff of complainants without subsequent recall held to be, in effect, a discharge because of their union activities. 148 C. 135. Cited. 149 C. 6. Institution of shop regulations as subterfuge to discharge employee is unfair labor practice. 150 C. 597. Dispatchers held not employees; thus taxi company not in violation of statute. 151 C. 573. Cited. 162 C. 579. Cited. 14 CS 72. The hiring of men known not to be in favor of the union in order to destroy union's majority status held to be an unfair labor practice. 19 CS 280. Cited. 20 CS 11. Failure of union to properly represent an employee held an unfair labor practice under federal statute. Id., 438. Cited. 22 CS 138. Although defendant was a union representative, employer did not violate section by refusing to discuss grievances with him because there was no claim by defendant nor finding of the court that he was the duly designated or selected representative of the employees as required. 3 Conn. Cir. Ct. 529. Subdiv. (5): Union shop clause expressly provided for. 180 C. 459. Subdiv. (6): An unfair labor practice under Subdiv. must be a failure to bargain with a union which in fact had been selected as bargaining agent for a unit. 147 C. 344. If collective bargaining agreement does not permit individual employee to seek arbitration personally, then employee must seek relief through bargaining agent. Id., 608. Cited. 175 C. 165. Refusal to bargain collectively with certified representatives of one's employees violates section. Id., 625. Cited. 232 C. 57. Cited. 43 CS 340. Subdiv. (10): Picketing to compel employer to violate provision of Subdiv. is unlawful. 146 C. 93.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗