California § 2030.010. 2030.010. (Amended by Stats. 2015, Ch. 303, Sec. 42.)

California Statutes

§ 2030.010. — 2030.010. (Amended by Stats. 2015, Ch. 303, Sec. 42.)

California § 2030.010.

JurisdictionCalifornia

Code CCPCode of Civil Procedure - CCP

Title4.

Part 4.TITLE 4. CIVIL DISCOVERY ACT

Ch. 13.CHAPTER 13. Written Interrogatories

Art. 1.ARTICLE 1. Propounding Interrogatories

This text of California § 2030.010. (2030.010. (Amended by Stats. 2015, Ch. 303, Sec. 42.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cal. Code of Civil Procedure - CCP Code § 2030.010. (2026).

Text

(a)Any party may obtain discovery within the scope delimited by Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 2017.010), and subject to the restrictions set forth in Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2019.010), by propounding to any other party to the action written interrogatories to be answered under oath.

(b)An interrogatory may relate to whether another party is making a certain contention, or to the facts, witnesses, and writings on which a contention is based. An interrogatory is not objectionable because an answer to it involves an opinion or contention that relates to fact or the application of law to fact, or would be based on information obtained or legal theories developed in anticipation of litigation or in preparation for trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(a)
Any party may obtain discovery within the scope delimited by Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 2017.010), and subject to the restrictions set forth in Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2019.010), by propounding to any other party to the action written interrogatories to be answered under oath.
(b)
An interrogatory may relate to
whether another party is making a certain contention, or to the facts, witnesses, and writings on which a contention is based. An interrogatory is not objectionable because an answer to it involves an opinion or contention that relates to fact or the application of law to fact, or would be based on information obtained or legal theories developed in anticipation of litigation or in preparation for trial.