Wilson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wilson v. State

775 So. 2d 1003, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 92, 2001 WL 20780

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 10, 2001·No. No. 1D00-2068·Published·Cited by 19 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of mandamus, William D. Wilson seeks an order of this court compelling the circuit court to rule on his pending motion for postconviction relief. We issued an order to show cause, and based on the state’s response, we are satisfied that reasonable measures are being taken to ensure that petitioner’s motion will be disposed of as promptly as circumstances permit. Accordingly, while we encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts to expeditiously dispose of the motion pending below, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

MINER, BENTON and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of mandamus, William D. Wilson seeks an order of this court compelling the circuit court to rule on his pending motion for postconviction relief. We issued an order to show cause, and based on the state’s response, we are satisfied that reasonable measures are being taken to ensure that petitioner’s motion will be disposed of as promptly as circumstances permit. Accordingly, while we encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts to expeditiously dispose of the motion pending below, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

MINER, BENTON and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Wilson v. State, 775 So. 2d 1003, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 92, 2001 WL 20780 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

775 So. 2d 1003 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related