Lane v. State
This text of 182 So. 3d 891 (Lane v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This petition for writ of mandamus seeks to compel a ruling on a motion for postconviction relief. Because the circuit court has recently issued an order striking one ground of the motion with leave-, to amend, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Munn v. Florida Parole Commission, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). (holding that where the trial court has recently taken action, mandamus relief was not warranted). However, we encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts to expeditiously dispose of the motion pending below. See Wilson v. State, 775 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
182 So. 3d 891, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 393, 2016 WL 121594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lane-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.