Freddie Roosevelt Taylor v. State of Florida
This text of Freddie Roosevelt Taylor v. State of Florida (Freddie Roosevelt Taylor v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
FREDDIE ROOSEVELT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO TAYLOR, FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Petitioner, CASE NO. 1D14-4362 v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. ___________________________/
Opinion filed January 7, 2015.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.
Freddie Roosevelt Taylor, pro se, Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus because the circuit court has
recently granted petitioner leave to amend his pending motion for post-conviction
relief. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
However, we encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts to expeditiously dispose of the motion pending below. Wilson v. State, 775 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 1st
DCA 2001).
BENTON, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Freddie Roosevelt Taylor v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freddie-roosevelt-taylor-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2015.