Thomas v. State

182 So. 3d 890, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 394, 2016 WL 121591
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 12, 2016
DocketNo. 1D15-4234
StatusPublished

This text of 182 So. 3d 890 (Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. State, 182 So. 3d 890, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 394, 2016 WL 121591 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This petition for writ of mandamus seeks to compel a ruling on a motion for postconviction relief. Because the circuit [891]*891court has recently directed the state to file a response to the pending motion, the pétition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Munn v. Florida Parole Commission, 807 So.2d 783 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (holding that where the trial court has issued ‘ a recent order to show cause, mandamus relief was not warranted). However, we encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts to expeditiously dispose of the motion pending below. See Wilson v. State, 775 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). ■

THOMAS, SWANSON, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mri Serv. Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., Company
807 So. 2d 783 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Wilson v. State
775 So. 2d 1003 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 So. 3d 890, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 394, 2016 WL 121591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.