Rutherford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rutherford v. State

192 So. 3d 89, 2016 WL 3031096, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8101

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 27, 2016

DocketNo. 1D16-1188

StatusPublished

This text of 192 So. 3d 89 (Rutherford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rutherford v. State, 192 So. 3d 89, 2016 WL 3031096, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8101 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This petition for writ of mandamus seeks to compel a ruling on a motion for postconviction relief. Because the circuit court has recently issued an order striking four grounds raised in the motion with leave to amend, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus, but encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts to expeditiously dispose of the motion pending below. Wilson v. State, 775 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

THOMAS, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This petition for writ of mandamus seeks to compel a ruling on a motion for postconviction relief. Because the circuit court has recently issued an order striking four grounds raised in the motion with leave to amend, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus, but encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts to expeditiously dispose of the motion pending below. Wilson v. State, 775 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

THOMAS, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 So. 3d 89, 2016 WL 3031096, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rutherford-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack