Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Carpenter v. State

Carpenter v. State

190 So. 3d 228, 2016 WL 1725937, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6567, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1053
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 29, 2016
DocketNo. 1D15-5753
StatusPublished

This text of 190 So. 3d 228 (Carpenter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carpenter v. State, 190 So. 3d 228, 2016 WL 1725937, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6567, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1053 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This pro se pétition for writ of mandamus seeks to compel a ruling on a motion for postconviction relief * Because the circuit court has recently directed the State Attorney to file a response to the pending motion, we deny the petition for writ - of mandamus. We encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts to.expeditiously dispose of the motion pending below. Wilson v. State, 775 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS and RAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. State
775 So. 2d 1003 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 So. 3d 228, 2016 WL 1725937, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6567, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpenter-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.