Wilburn H. Rutherford v. State of Florida
This text of Wilburn H. Rutherford v. State of Florida (Wilburn H. Rutherford v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
WILBURN H. RUTHERFORD, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D16-1188
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. ___________________________/
Opinion filed May 27, 2016.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.
Wilburn H. Rutherford, pro se, Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
This petition for writ of mandamus seeks to compel a ruling on a motion for
postconviction relief. Because the circuit court has recently issued an order striking
four grounds raised in the motion with leave to amend, we deny the petition for writ of
mandamus, but encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts to expeditiously
dispose of the motion pending below. Wilson v. State, 775 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA
2001).
THOMAS, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wilburn H. Rutherford v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilburn-h-rutherford-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2016.