Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Taylor v. State

Taylor v. State

153 So. 3d 991, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 168, 2015 WL 73775
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 7, 2015
DocketNo. 1D14-4362
StatusPublished

This text of 153 So. 3d 991 (Taylor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. State, 153 So. 3d 991, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 168, 2015 WL 73775 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus because the circuit court has recently granted petitioner leave to amend his pending motion for post-conviction relief. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). However,, we encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts to expeditiously dispose of the [992]*992motion pending below. Wilson v. State, 775 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

BENTON, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Munn v. Florida Parole Commission
807 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Wilson v. State
775 So. 2d 1003 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 So. 3d 991, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 168, 2015 WL 73775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.