Williams v. State
33 S.W.3d 595, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1566, 2000 WL 1576950
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2375 →
Opinion
ORDER
Belinda Williams (Movant) files this appeal challenging the denial of her Rule 29.15 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 33 S.W.3d 595, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1566, 2000 WL 1576950 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).
33 S.W.3d 595 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.