Williams v. State
9 S.W.3d 722, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 86, 2000 WL 29911
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2375 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Chickila Williams, appeals from the denial of her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We [723]*723affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 9 S.W.3d 722, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 86, 2000 WL 29911 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).
9 S.W.3d 722 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.