Williams v. State
986 S.W.2d 521, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 197
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1319 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant Kenny Williams appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 986 S.W.2d 521, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 197 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).
986 S.W.2d 521 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.