Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Williams v. State

924 S.W.2d 44, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1014, 1996 WL 310284

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 11, 1996

DocketNo. 68731

StatusPublished

This text of 924 S.W.2d 44 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. State, 924 S.W.2d 44, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1014, 1996 WL 310284 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

924 S.W.2d 44, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1014, 1996 WL 310284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-moctapp-1996.