Williams v. State
977 S.W.2d 934, 1998 WL 720711
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1319 →
Opinion
ORDER
Steve Williams (Movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 977 S.W.2d 934, 1998 WL 720711 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).
977 S.W.2d 934 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.