Williams v. State
909 S.W.2d 397, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1842, 1995 WL 671970
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1319 →
Opinion
ORDER
Paul Williams appeals from the denial of his 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without evidentiary hearing. He claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because counsel was ineffective in that he: (1) misinformed Williams about the amount of credit he would receive; and (2) failed to interview and depose all the State’s witnesses because a viable self-defense claim would have been uncovered. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 909 S.W.2d 397, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1842, 1995 WL 671970 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).
909 S.W.2d 397 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.