Williams v. State
894 S.W.2d 254, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 382, 1995 WL 95031
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals from the motion court’s dismissal, for untimeliness, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The motion court’s conclusion is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 894 S.W.2d 254, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 382, 1995 WL 95031 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).
894 S.W.2d 254 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.