Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Williams v. State

Williams v. State

838 S.W.2d 25, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1210, 1992 WL 174175
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 92 →
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 28, 1992·No. No. 60999·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Richard A. Williams, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, as well as the tran[26]*26script and the legal file, and find no clear error in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court. In addition, we find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 838 S.W.2d 25, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1210, 1992 WL 174175 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

838 S.W.2d 25 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.