Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Williams v. State

829 S.W.2d 622, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 562, 1992 WL 62132

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 92 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 31, 1992·No. No. 59986·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Williams appeals his conviction by the motion court of first degree assault. Davis also appeals from an order denying his Rule 29.15 motion on the merits following an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Williams appeals his conviction by the motion court of first degree assault. Davis also appeals from an order denying his Rule 29.15 motion on the merits following an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Williams v. State, 829 S.W.2d 622, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 562, 1992 WL 62132 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

829 S.W.2d 622 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.