Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Williams v. State

938 S.W.2d 346, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 189, 1997 WL 52999

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 11, 1997

DocketNo. WD 53095

StatusPublished

This text of 938 S.W.2d 346 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. State, 938 S.W.2d 346, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 189, 1997 WL 52999 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alonzo Williams appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief. Williams pled guilty to one count of robbery in the first degree and one count of armed criminal action. He claims that he was compelled to enter a guilty plea because his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate alibi witnesses.

Affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alonzo Williams appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief. Williams pled guilty to one count of robbery in the first degree and one count of armed criminal action. He claims that he was compelled to enter a guilty plea because his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate alibi witnesses.

Affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

938 S.W.2d 346, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 189, 1997 WL 52999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-moctapp-1997.