Williams v. State

950 S.W.2d 325, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1515, 1997 WL 523886
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1319
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 26, 1997·No. No. 71761·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 950 S.W.2d 325, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1515, 1997 WL 523886 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

950 S.W.2d 325 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.