Williams v. State

987 S.W.2d 520, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 323
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1319
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 16, 1999·No. No. 74973·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Lewis Williams was convicted of first degree robbery, Section 569.030 RSMo 1994. Movant filed a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 alleging that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction and also alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Movant now appeals the judgment denying his motion without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erro[521]*521neous. Rule 29.15(k). No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 987 S.W.2d 520, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 323 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

987 S.W.2d 520 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.