Williams v. State

14 S.W.3d 153, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 128, 2000 WL 51837
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2375
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 25, 2000·No. No. ED 75739·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Willie Williams (“Appellant”) appeals from a judgment denying Appellant’s request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15.1 Appellant claims ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 14 S.W.3d 153, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 128, 2000 WL 51837 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

14 S.W.3d 153 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.