Williams v. State

18 S.W.3d 117, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 529, 2000 WL 387092
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2375
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 18, 2000·No. No. ED 76374·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from a judgment, denying without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 18 S.W.3d 117, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 529, 2000 WL 387092 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

18 S.W.3d 117 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.