United States v. Alston
This text of United States v. Alston (United States v. Alston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6065
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
THOMAS LEROY ALSTON,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (2:08-cr-00828-PMD-1)
Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 6, 2010
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Leroy Alston, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Thomas Leroy Alston appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for return of property, pursuant to Fed. R.
Crim. P. 41(g). Alston does not contest the assertion of the
United States that none of the disputed property is in its
possession. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Alston, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alston-ca4-2010.