United States v. Alston
373 F. App'x 331
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Alston. Read the opinion of the Court — 611 F.3d 219 →
Opinion
Thomas Leroy Alston appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for return of property, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g). Alston does not contest the assertion of the United States that none of the disputed property is in its possession. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Alston, 373 F. App'x 331 (4th Cir. 2010).
373 F. App'x 331 (United States v. Alston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.