United States v. Alston

459 F. App'x 248
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Alston. Read the opinion of the Court — 611 F.3d 219
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 22, 2011·No. No. 11-6712·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cedric Dante Alston appeals the district court’s order denying his motions to compel the Government to file a Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Alston’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Alston has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Alston, 459 F. App'x 248 (4th Cir. 2011).

459 F. App'x 248 (United States v. Alston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.