United States v. Alston

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Alston. Read the opinion of the Court — 611 F.3d 219
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 6, 2010·No. 10-6065·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6065

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

THOMAS LEROY ALSTON,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (2:08-cr-00828-PMD-1)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 6, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Leroy Alston, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Thomas Leroy Alston appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for return of property, pursuant to Fed. R.

Crim. P. 41(g). Alston does not contest the assertion of the

United States that none of the disputed property is in its

possession. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Alston, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Alston (United States v. Alston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.