Nebel v. . Nebel

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Nebel v. . Nebel

161 S.E. 223, 201 N.C. 840, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 140

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedNovember 25, 1931

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 161 S.E. 223 (Nebel v. . Nebel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nebel v. . Nebel, 161 S.E. 223, 201 N.C. 840, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 140 (N.C. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an action brought by plaintiff against the defendant (1) for alimony without divorce (2) application for an allowance for subsistencependente lite. 3 C. S., 1667. The Court being evenly divided in opinion, one of the members, the ChiefJustice, not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed and stands as the decision of this action, without becoming a precedent. Goochv. Western Union Tel. Co., 196 N.C. 823; Tarboro v. Johnson, 196 N.C. 824;Parsons v. Board of Education, 200 N.C. 88; Durham v. Lloyd, 200 N.C. 803.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an action brought by plaintiff against the defendant (1) for alimony without divorce (2) application for an allowance for subsistencependente lite. 3 C. S., 1667. The Court being evenly divided in opinion, one of the members, the ChiefJustice, not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed and stands as the decision of this action, without becoming a precedent. Goochv. Western Union Tel. Co., 196 N.C. 823; Tarboro v. Johnson, 196 N.C. 824;Parsons v. Board of Education, 200 N.C. 88; Durham v. Lloyd, 200 N.C. 803.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 S.E. 223, 201 N.C. 840, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nebel-v-nebel-nc-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack