Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Maney

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Maney

170 S.E. 629, 205 N.C. 834, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 615

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedSeptember 20, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 170 S.E. 629 (Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Maney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Maney, 170 S.E. 629, 205 N.C. 834, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 615 (N.C. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Brogden, J., not sitting, the judgment stands affirmed without becoming a precedent *835 in accordance with the general rule of appellate courts in such situations. Garrison v. R. R., 202 N. C., 851, 164 S. E., 115; Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N. C., 840, 161 S. E., 223; Durham v. Lloyd, 200 N. C., 803, 157 S. E., 136.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Brogden, J., not sitting, the judgment stands affirmed without becoming a precedent *835 in accordance with the general rule of appellate courts in such situations. Garrison v. R. R., 202 N. C., 851, 164 S. E., 115; Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N. C., 840, 161 S. E., 223; Durham v. Lloyd, 200 N. C., 803, 157 S. E., 136.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 S.E. 629, 205 N.C. 834, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federal-land-bank-of-columbia-v-maney-nc-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack