Davis v. . McDevitt

164 S.E. 115, 202 N.C. 851, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 279
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 18, 1932·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

We have discovered no • reversible error on the record. It is admitted that plaintiffs and defendants claim title from a common source. 'His Honor was of opinion that of the two titles shown, the plaintiffs had the better, and so instructed the jury. Mobley v. Griffin, 104 N. C., 112, 10 S. E., 142. In this, we find

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. . McDevitt, 164 S.E. 115, 202 N.C. 851, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 279 (N.C. 1932).

164 S.E. 115 (Davis v. . McDevitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Maney
170 S.E. 629 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)