Garrison v. . R. R.

164 S.E. 924, 202 N.C. 851, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 280
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 18, 1932
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 164 S.E. 924 (Garrison v. . R. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garrison v. . R. R., 164 S.E. 924, 202 N.C. 851, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 280 (N.C. 1932).

Opinion

Civil action to recover damages for alleged breach of contract in removing spur track running from defendant's main line to plaintiff's premises in the town of Morganton, brought under authority of Parrott v. R.R., 165 N.C. 295, 81 S.E. 348.

From a judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of plaintiff's evidence, he appeals, assigning errors. *Page 852 The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Clarkson, J., taking no part in the consideration or decision of the case, the judgment of the Superior Court stands affirmed in accordance with the general practice of appellate courts, without becoming a precedent. Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N.C. 840;Durham v. Lloyd, 200 N.C. 803, 157 S.E. 136.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Maney
170 S.E. 629 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 S.E. 924, 202 N.C. 851, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrison-v-r-r-nc-1932.