Garrison v. . R. R.

164 S.E. 924, 202 N.C. 851, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 280
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 18, 1932·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Civil action to recover damages for alleged breach of contract in removing spur track running from defendant's main line to plaintiff's premises in the town of Morganton, brought under authority of Parrott v. R.R., 165 N.C. 295, 81 S.E. 348.

From a judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of plaintiff's evidence, he appeals, assigning errors. *Page 852 The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Clarkson, J., taking no part in the consideration or decision of the case, the judgment of the Superior Court stands affirmed in accordance with the general practice of appellate courts, without becoming a precedent. Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N.C. 840;Durham v. Lloyd, 200 N.C. 803, 157 S.E. 136.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garrison v. . R. R., 164 S.E. 924, 202 N.C. 851, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 280 (N.C. 1932).

164 S.E. 924 (Garrison v. . R. R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Maney
170 S.E. 629 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)