Garrison v. . R. R.
This text of 164 S.E. 924 (Garrison v. . R. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Civil action to recover damages for alleged breach of contract in removing spur track running from defendant's main line to plaintiff's premises in the town of Morganton, brought under authority of Parrott v. R.R.,
From a judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of plaintiff's evidence, he appeals, assigning errors. *Page 852
The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Clarkson, J., taking no part in the consideration or decision of the case, the judgment of the Superior Court stands affirmed in accordance with the general practice of appellate courts, without becoming a precedent. Nebel v. Nebel,
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
164 S.E. 924, 202 N.C. 851, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrison-v-r-r-nc-1932.