Durham v. . Lloyd

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Durham v. . Lloyd

157 S.E. 136, 200 N.C. 803, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 456

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMarch 11, 1931

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 157 S.E. 136 (Durham v. . Lloyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Durham v. . Lloyd, 157 S.E. 136, 200 N.C. 803, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 456 (N.C. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

. The court being evenly divided in opinion as to the validity of defendant’s assignments of error on his appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court, Brogden, J., not sitting, the judgment is affirmed, in accordance with the practice in this Court. This decision disposes of the appeal, without becoming a precedent. Parsons v. Board of Education, ante, 88, 156 S. E., 244; Gooch v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 196 N. C., 823, 146 S. E., 803, and cases cited.

Affirmed.

BrogdeN, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

. The court being evenly divided in opinion as to the validity of defendant’s assignments of error on his appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court, Brogden, J., not sitting, the judgment is affirmed, in accordance with the practice in this Court. This decision disposes of the appeal, without becoming a precedent. Parsons v. Board of Education, ante, 88, 156 S. E., 244; Gooch v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 196 N. C., 823, 146 S. E., 803, and cases cited.

Affirmed.

BrogdeN, J., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 S.E. 136, 200 N.C. 803, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durham-v-lloyd-nc-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack