Durham v. . Lloyd

157 S.E. 136, 200 N.C. 803, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 456
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 11, 1931·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

. The court being evenly divided in opinion as to the validity of defendant’s assignments of error on his appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court, Brogden, J., not sitting, the judgment is affirmed, in accordance with the practice in this Court. This decision disposes of the appeal, without becoming a precedent. Parsons v. Board of Education, ante, 88, 156 S. E., 244; Gooch v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 196 N. C., 823, 146 S. E., 803, and cases cited.

Affirmed.

BrogdeN, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Durham v. . Lloyd, 157 S.E. 136, 200 N.C. 803, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 456 (N.C. 1931).

157 S.E. 136 (Durham v. . Lloyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. . Powell
181 S.E. 325 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Maney
170 S.E. 629 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
McKamey v. . Blair
166 S.E. 926 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
Garrison v. . R. R.
164 S.E. 924 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
Garrison v. Southern Railway Co.
202 N.C. 851 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
Nebel v. . Nebel
161 S.E. 223 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)