McKamey v. . Blair

Supreme Court of North Carolina

McKamey v. . Blair

166 S.E. 926, 203 N.C. 852, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 117

DecidedNovember 23, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 166 S.E. 926 (McKamey v. . Blair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKamey v. . Blair, 166 S.E. 926, 203 N.C. 852, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 117 (N.C. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

CLARKSON, J., not sitting. Civil action to recover damages for alleged negligent injury.

There was a verdict and judgment for the defendant, from which the plaintiff appeals, assigning errors. The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Clarkson, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed and stands as the decision in this case without becoming a precedent. Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N.C. 840,161 S.E. 223; Durham v. Lloyd, 200 N.C. 803, 157 S.E. 136; Gooch v.Tel. Co., 196 N.C. 823, 146 S.E. 803.

Affirmed.

CLARKSON, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CLARKSON, J., not sitting. Civil action to recover damages for alleged negligent injury.

There was a verdict and judgment for the defendant, from which the plaintiff appeals, assigning errors. The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Clarkson, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed and stands as the decision in this case without becoming a precedent. Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N.C. 840,161 S.E. 223; Durham v. Lloyd, 200 N.C. 803, 157 S.E. 136; Gooch v.Tel. Co., 196 N.C. 823, 146 S.E. 803.

Affirmed.

CLARKSON, J., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 S.E. 926, 203 N.C. 852, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckamey-v-blair-nc-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack