Smith v. . Powell

181 S.E. 325, 208 N.C. 837, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 158
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 18, 1935
StatusPublished

This text of 181 S.E. 325 (Smith v. . Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. . Powell, 181 S.E. 325, 208 N.C. 837, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 158 (N.C. 1935).

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Clarkson, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed in accordance with the usual practice of appellate courts, and stands as the decision in this case without becoming a precedent. Durham v. Lloyd, 200 N. C., 803, 157 S. E., 136; Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N. C., 840, 161 S. E., 223.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Durham v. . Lloyd
157 S.E. 136 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
Nebel v. . Nebel
161 S.E. 223 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
Nebel v. Nebel
201 N.C. 840 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 S.E. 325, 208 N.C. 837, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-powell-nc-1935.