Allen v. Mutual Life Insurance

190 S.E. 735, 211 N.C. 736, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 201
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 7, 1937·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Cubiam.

One member of the Court, Schenck, J., being absent, and the remaining four being equally divided in opinion as to whether reversible error has been shown, particularly on the refusal to nonsuit, the judgment of the Superior Court, accordant with the usual practice in such cases, is affirmed and stands as the decision in this case, without becoming a precedent. Jackson v. Trust Co., ante, 733; Brown v. Assurance Society, 210 N. C., 825; S. v. Swan, 209 N. C., 836, 183 S. E., 285; Sessoms v. R. R., 208 N. C., 844, 182 S. E., 112; Beam v. Pub. Co., ibid., 837, 181 S. E., 326; Trust Co. v. Hood, Comr., 207 N. C., 862, 177 S. E., 16; Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N. C., 840, 161 S. E., 223.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. Mutual Life Insurance, 190 S.E. 735, 211 N.C. 736, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 201 (N.C. 1937).

190 S.E. 735 (Allen v. Mutual Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Smith
90 S.E.2d 328 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)
State v. Brown
89 S.E.2d 157 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)
Mid-Continent Refrigerator Co. v. Davenport
89 S.E.2d 153 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)
Toxey v. . Meggs
4 S.E.2d 513 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)