Allen v. Mutual Life Insurance
Opinion
One member of the Court, Schenck, J., being absent, and the remaining four being equally divided in opinion as to whether reversible error has been shown, particularly on the refusal to nonsuit, the judgment of the Superior Court, accordant with the usual practice in such cases, is affirmed and stands as the decision in this case, without becoming a precedent. Jackson v. Trust Co., ante, 733; Brown v. Assurance Society, 210 N. C., 825; S. v. Swan, 209 N. C., 836, 183 S. E., 285; Sessoms v. R. R., 208 N. C., 844, 182 S. E., 112; Beam v. Pub. Co., ibid., 837, 181 S. E., 326; Trust Co. v. Hood, Comr., 207 N. C., 862, 177 S. E., 16; Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N. C., 840, 161 S. E., 223.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
190 S.E. 735 (Allen v. Mutual Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.