State v. Brown

89 S.E.2d 157, 242 N.C. 602, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 639
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 21, 1955·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER Curiam.

It is the unanimous opinion of this Court that defendant’s motion for nonsuit was properly overruled.

Two members of the Court, Winborne and Higgins, JJ., not sitting, but with Devin, Emergency Justice, participating in lieu of Winborne, J., and the six sitting members being equally divided in opinion as to whether prejudicial error in the conduct of the trial has been shown, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed, without becoming a precedent. Allen v. Ins. Co., 211 N.C. 736, 190 S.E. 735.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Brown, 89 S.E.2d 157, 242 N.C. 602, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 639 (N.C. 1955).

89 S.E.2d 157 (State v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Woodruff
297 S.E.2d 382 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1982)
State v. Smith
90 S.E.2d 328 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)