State v. Brown
This text of 89 S.E.2d 157 (State v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is the unanimous opinion of this Court that defendant’s motion for nonsuit was properly overruled.
Two members of the Court, Winborne and Higgins, JJ., not sitting, but with Devin, Emergency Justice, participating in lieu of Winborne, J., and the six sitting members being equally divided in opinion as to whether prejudicial error in the conduct of the trial has been shown, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed, without becoming a precedent. Allen v. Ins. Co., 211 N.C. 736, 190 S.E. 735.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 S.E.2d 157, 242 N.C. 602, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brown-nc-1955.