State v. . Swan

183 S.E. 285, 209 N.C. 836, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 369
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 22, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 183 S.E. 285 (State v. . Swan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Swan, 183 S.E. 285, 209 N.C. 836, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 369 (N.C. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This casé was argued at the Pali Term, 1934, and, after being considered in conference, was assigned to Justice Brogden for detailed investigation and report. Justice Brogden was taken ill soon thereafter and after several months died without submitting an opinion. Since his death the remaining members of the Court who heard the argument find themselves evenly divided upon the question of awarding the defendant a new trial.

In accord with the established practice, the Court being evenly divided in opinion, Justice Devin not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed and stands as the decision in this case without becoming a precedent. Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N. C., 840, and cases there cited.

Affirmed.

Devin, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parrish v. PIEDMONT PUBLISHING COMPANY
157 S.E.2d 334 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)
Allen v. Mutual Life Insurance
190 S.E. 735 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)
Jackson v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.
189 S.E. 763 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 S.E. 285, 209 N.C. 836, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-swan-nc-1936.