State v. . Swan
This text of 183 S.E. 285 (State v. . Swan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This casé was argued at the Pali Term, 1934, and, after being considered in conference, was assigned to Justice Brogden for detailed investigation and report. Justice Brogden was taken ill soon thereafter and after several months died without submitting an opinion. Since his death the remaining members of the Court who heard the argument find themselves evenly divided upon the question of awarding the defendant a new trial.
In accord with the established practice, the Court being evenly divided in opinion, Justice Devin not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed and stands as the decision in this case without becoming a precedent. Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N. C., 840, and cases there cited.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
183 S.E. 285, 209 N.C. 836, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-swan-nc-1936.