Jackson v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Jackson v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.

189 S.E. 763, 211 N.C. 733, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 197

DecidedFebruary 24, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 189 S.E. 763 (Jackson v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., 189 S.E. 763, 211 N.C. 733, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 197 (N.C. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee OueiaM.

One member of tbe Court, Schenck, J., being absent, and tbe remaining four being equally divided in opinion as to whether tbe matters of law or legal inference, debated on argument and brief, are presented by tbe record, tbe judgment of tbe Superior Court, accordant *734 with the usual practice in such, cases, is affirmed and stands as tbe decision in this ease, without becoming a precedent. S. v. Swan, 209 N. C., 836, 183 S. E., 285; Sessoms v. R. R., 208 N. C., 844, 182 S. E., 112.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee OueiaM.

One member of tbe Court, Schenck, J., being absent, and tbe remaining four being equally divided in opinion as to whether tbe matters of law or legal inference, debated on argument and brief, are presented by tbe record, tbe judgment of tbe Superior Court, accordant *734 with the usual practice in such, cases, is affirmed and stands as tbe decision in this ease, without becoming a precedent. S. v. Swan, 209 N. C., 836, 183 S. E., 285; Sessoms v. R. R., 208 N. C., 844, 182 S. E., 112.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 S.E. 763, 211 N.C. 733, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-branch-banking-trust-co-nc-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack