Home/Federal Circuit/Lizardtech v. Earth Resource Mapping [Revised Order]

Lizardtech v. Earth Resource Mapping [Revised Order]

433 F.3d 1373, 77 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1391, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 137, 2006 WL 23426
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJanuary 5, 2006
Docket2005-1062
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 433 F.3d 1373 (Lizardtech v. Earth Resource Mapping [Revised Order]) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lizardtech v. Earth Resource Mapping [Revised Order], 433 F.3d 1373, 77 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1391, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 137, 2006 WL 23426 (Fed. Cir. 2006).

Opinions

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

A petition for rehearing en banc was filed by the Appellant, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by the Appellees. The matter was first referred as a petition for rehearing to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc and response were referred to the circuit judges who are authorized to request a poll whether to rehear the appeal en banc. A poll was requested, taken, and failed.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
(2) The mandate of the court will issue on January 12, 2006.
LOURIE, Circuit Judge, with whom MICHEL, Chief Judge, and NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, join, concurs in a separate opinion. RADER, Circuit Judge, with whom GAJARSA, Circuit Judge, joins, dissents from the order denying rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Automated Layout Technologies, LLC v. Precision Steel Systems, LLC
D. Nebraska, 2023
Catilina Nominees Proprietary Ltd. v. Stericycle, Inc.
N.D. Illinois, 2018
Phigenix, Inc. v. Genentech Inc.
238 F. Supp. 3d 1177 (N.D. California, 2017)
McDavid, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc.
892 F. Supp. 2d 970 (N.D. Illinois, 2012)
Shell Global Solutions (US) Inc. v. RMS Engineering, Inc.
782 F. Supp. 2d 317 (S.D. Texas, 2011)
Volterra Semiconductor Corp. v. Primarion, Inc.
796 F. Supp. 2d 1025 (N.D. California, 2011)
Westerngeco LLC v. Ion Geophysical Corp.
735 F. Supp. 2d 623 (S.D. Texas, 2010)
Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co.
598 F.3d 1336 (Federal Circuit, 2010)
Tesco Corp. v. Weatherford International, Inc.
722 F. Supp. 2d 737 (S.D. Texas, 2010)
Crown Packaging Technology, Inc. v. Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp.
662 F. Supp. 2d 939 (S.D. Ohio, 2009)
3M Co. v. MOLDEX-METRIC, INC.
641 F. Supp. 2d 834 (D. Minnesota, 2009)
Rambus Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc.
569 F. Supp. 2d 946 (N.D. California, 2008)
Kowalski v. OCEAN DUKE CORP.
541 F. Supp. 2d 1148 (D. Hawaii, 2008)
Maytag Corp. v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
448 F. Supp. 2d 1034 (N.D. Iowa, 2006)
Lizardtech v. Earth Resource Mapping [Revised Order]
433 F.3d 1373 (Federal Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
433 F.3d 1373, 77 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1391, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 137, 2006 WL 23426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lizardtech-v-earth-resource-mapping-revised-order-cafc-2006.