FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 10
Inventions patentable
35 U.S.C. § 101
Title35 — Patents
Chapter10 — PATENTABILITY OF INVENTIONS
This text of 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Inventions patentable) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 101.
Text
Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation
822 F.3d 1327 (Federal Circuit, 2016)
Tli Communications LLC v. Av Automotive, L.L.C.
823 F.3d 607 (Federal Circuit, 2016)
Application of Charles D. Prater and James Wei
415 F.2d 1393 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1969)
Association for Molecular Pathology v. United States Patent & Trademark Office
689 F.3d 1303 (Federal Circuit, 2012)
Application of Albert W. Musgrave
431 F.2d 882 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1970)
Yoder Brothers, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. California-Florida Plant Corporation, Defendants-Appellees-Crossappellants. California-Florida Plant Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Crossappellants v. Yoder Brothers, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross
537 F.2d 1347 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)
Application of Alexander R. Surrey
370 F.2d 349 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1966)
Application of Herman Hoeksema
332 F.2d 374 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1964)
Manufacturing Research Corporation v. Graybar Electric Company
679 F.2d 1355 (Eleventh Circuit, 1982)
Agrashell, Inc. v. Hammons Products Company, Hammons Products Company v. Agrashell, Inc.
413 F.2d 89 (Eighth Circuit, 1969)
International Business Machines Corporation v. Zillow Group Inc
(W.D. Washington, 2022)
Datanet LLC v. Microsoft Corporation
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Kroy IP Holdings, LLC v. Groupon, Inc.
(D. Delaware, 2022)
American GNC Corporation v. Nintendo Co Ltd
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
US Patent No 7,679,637 LLC v. Google LLC
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Atos, LLC v. Allstate Insurance Company
(Federal Circuit, 2025)
Innovaport LLC v. Target Corporation
(W.D. Wisconsin, 2024)
Innovaport LLC v. IKEA North America Services LLC
(E.D. Wisconsin, 2022)
Source Credit
History
(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 797.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §31 (R.S. 4886, amended (1) Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 391, §1, 29 Stat. 692, (2) May 23, 1930, ch. 312, §1, 46 Stat. 376, (3) Aug. 5, 1939, ch. 450, §1, 53 Stat. 1212).
The corresponding section of existing statute is split into two sections, section 101 relating to the subject matter for which patents may be obtained, and section 102 defining statutory novelty and stating other conditions for patentability.
Section 101 follows the wording of the existing statute as to the subject matter for patents, except that reference to plant patents has been omitted for incorporation in section 301 and the word "art" has been replaced by "process", which is defined in section 100. The word "art" in the corresponding section of the existing statute has a different meaning than the same word as used in other places in the statute; it has been interpreted by the courts as being practically synonymous with process or method. "Process" has been used as its meaning is more readily grasped than "art" as interpreted, and the definition in section 100(b) makes it clear that "process or method" is meant. The remainder of the definition clarifies the status of processes or methods which involve merely the new use of a known process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, or material; they are processes or methods under the statute and may be patented provided the conditions for patentability are satisfied.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Limitation on Issuance of Patents
Pub. L. 112–29, §33, Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 340, provided that:
"(a) Limitation.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no patent may issue on a claim directed to or encompassing a human organism.
"(b) Effective Date.—
"(1) In general.—Subsection (a) shall apply to any application for patent that is pending on, or filed on or after, the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 16, 2011].
"(2) Prior applications.—Subsection (a) shall not affect the validity of any patent issued on an application to which paragraph (1) does not apply."
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §31 (R.S. 4886, amended (1) Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 391, §1, 29 Stat. 692, (2) May 23, 1930, ch. 312, §1, 46 Stat. 376, (3) Aug. 5, 1939, ch. 450, §1, 53 Stat. 1212).
The corresponding section of existing statute is split into two sections, section 101 relating to the subject matter for which patents may be obtained, and section 102 defining statutory novelty and stating other conditions for patentability.
Section 101 follows the wording of the existing statute as to the subject matter for patents, except that reference to plant patents has been omitted for incorporation in section 301 and the word "art" has been replaced by "process", which is defined in section 100. The word "art" in the corresponding section of the existing statute has a different meaning than the same word as used in other places in the statute; it has been interpreted by the courts as being practically synonymous with process or method. "Process" has been used as its meaning is more readily grasped than "art" as interpreted, and the definition in section 100(b) makes it clear that "process or method" is meant. The remainder of the definition clarifies the status of processes or methods which involve merely the new use of a known process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, or material; they are processes or methods under the statute and may be patented provided the conditions for patentability are satisfied.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Limitation on Issuance of Patents
Pub. L. 112–29, §33, Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 340, provided that:
"(a) Limitation.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no patent may issue on a claim directed to or encompassing a human organism.
"(b) Effective Date.—
"(1) In general.—Subsection (a) shall apply to any application for patent that is pending on, or filed on or after, the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 16, 2011].
"(2) Prior applications.—Subsection (a) shall not affect the validity of any patent issued on an application to which paragraph (1) does not apply."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/101.