Jones v. State

345 S.W.3d 398, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1060, 2011 WL 3569829

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lyndon Jones appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(h), (k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1 . All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.