Jones v. State

295 S.W.3d 227, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1463, 2009 WL 3364260
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 20, 2009·No. ED 92606·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thomas M. Jones, Jr. appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion under Rule 24.035 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing. 1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2008, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 295 S.W.3d 227, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1463, 2009 WL 3364260 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

295 S.W.3d 227 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Sanders
295 S.W.3d 227 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)